If you want out of the union (I’m sorry…partnership), let me know and I’ll be glad to send you the necessary forms.
Dave Ohmart coloradoloses@comcast.net
If you want out of the union (I’m sorry…partnership), let me know and I’ll be glad to send you the necessary forms.
Dave Ohmart coloradoloses@comcast.net
It seems like every couple of weeks we hear of all the wonderful things WINS is doing for us in conjunction with DPA or other state departments. You need to know what is really going on.
Membership comprises about ten percent of the total state employee population (just over 3,000), but they are now controlling your future. A small group of WINS members in Pueblo have now voted on a 12-hour workday for all correction officers. They told those who opposed this action, “If you want to have any voice about your job, you must become a member of WINS.”
WINS has now taken your voice from you…not enhanced it! A group of disgruntled employees now control you. You have no say, anymore, in what happens to your life as a state employee. It has been taken from you because 25% of your fellows voted WINS as our “partnership” 18 months ago, yet less than half of that number now run your work life.
Colorado Loses took a recent poll. Of the 504 who answered the question about membership, 9.9% stated they were members. However, 18.5% stated they were favorable of WINS and 31.2% said they favor having a union. When asked if they would vote for WINS in the future, 65.1% said NO!
ColoradoWINS is nothing more than an arm of SEIU (Service Employees International Union) the single, largest union in the country. SEIU has convinced a few naive coworkers that if they provide one percent (1%) of their gross wages, SEIU, under the guise of WINS, will get them better healthcare, higher wages, and, somehow, make their lives better.
As part of the WINS’s charter, they will push beyond the governor’s executive order and ask the General Assembly to make their existence law. There is a very good chance this will happen before May 2010. It will require ALL state employees, who are not members, to pay a maintenance fee. That fee could be from ¼% to ½% of your gross pay. This could bring between $7,000,000 and $13,000,000 to their coffers. Why does WINS need that much money? Where will it go? Take a wild guess.
How do I know this? It happened in Maine. The state employee union forced all non-members to pay a maintenance fee. It is a payment to the union for services provided to non-members by their actions. You do the math…take .5% of your gross pay and give it to someone to make your decisions for you. If you think they can’t do that – the US Supreme court said they could.
BREAKING NEWS…Pueblo, CO: ColoradoWINS forced themselves upon state correction officers December 17, 2009 when “WINS members only” voted to force Department of Corrections (DOC) employees to work 12-hour shifts. Jeff Hotchkiss, a sergeant at the Pueblo correction facility, filed a formal complaint of discrimination against the DOC and the State of Colorado that WINS is “forcing” non-members to join if they want a voice in decisions about their work environment.
Here is the formal complaint by Sgt. Jeff Hotchkiss:
“On December 15, 2009 at about 0550 a.m. in the San Carlos roll call room I (Jeff Hotchkiss) along with all day shift staff were addressed by Bob Cantwell, Director of Prisons and Lou Archuleta, Deputy Director of Prisons. The meeting was concerning the upcoming vote by staff to obtain their opinion of going to twelve hour shifts. Also present were Gabe Hernandez and a Mr. Parker representing the Employee’s Organization (WINS). All staff were notified at that time that there would be a vote concerning the (MSP) Multi-Shift pilot program. We were also told that only WINS member’s would be allowed to vote. We were told that if you want to have a say, join WINS. Several people voiced their anger about the vote. I also spoke up and stated that what they were purposing was wrong.
“It was clearly a decided issue and our protests were in vein. Having top D.O.C. officials present added an intimidating factor to the meeting. The action taken was discriminatory in nature and created a hostile work environment. On December 17, 2009 the WINS vote was conducted, discriminating against employees and myself for not being members of their organization. Direct violation of Administrative Regulation 1450-05, Dept. Vision and Values statements, State Personnel Rules and Governor Executive Order D 028 07. I felt like I was being forced to join the Employee’s Organization and being intimidated by top D.O.C. officials. I personally, was emotionally shocked by the presentation. I cannot believe the gall and arrogance of the D.O.C. and WINS to stand up and blatantly discriminate against me and fellow staff. I found the presentation and the vote to be offensive and against, what any reasonable person would consider fair and or just.” [I edited this to protect other state employees by removing their names.]
I will provide more information as it comes in.
Is this how you want WINS to represent YOU??? This is what’s coming! A small handful of disgruntled employees will do what they want unless you join with them and pay dues of 1% of your gross salary.
What can we do about it? We can vote them out! I hope to present an opportunity soon that will allow us to vote WINS out. Watch for updates on the website. Tell your friends to get on my email list or to watch the website, too.
Dave Ohmart
The Biggest Loser
| 1. First, please confirm that you are currently a state employee, and that you are the person addressed to in this email. | |||
| answered question | 568 | ||
| skipped question | 0 | ||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
||
| Yes | 99.6% | 566 | |
| No | 0.4% | 2 | |
| 1. Approximately how many years have you been a state employee? | |||
| answered question | 504 | ||
| skipped question | 64 | ||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
||
| Less than a year | 8.5% | 43 | |
| 1 to 2 years | 9.9% | 50 | |
| 3 to 5 years | 18.7% | 94 | |
| 6 to 10 years | 21.4% | 108 | |
| 11 or more years | 41.5% | 209 | |
| 2. What is your current job level? | ||
| answered question | 504 | |
| skipped question | 64 | |
| Response Count |
||
| Show replies | 504 | |
| 3. Are you currently a paying member of your designated state employee union? | |||
| answered question | 504 | ||
| skipped question | 64 | ||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
||
| Yes | 9.9% | 50 | |
| No | 90.1% | 454 | |
| 4. As you may know, WINS is currently your designated state employee union. Regardless of your membership status, what is your general impression or opinion of WINS? | ||||
| answered question | 504 | |||
| skipped question | 64 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| Favorable | 18.5% | 93 | ||
| Unfavorable | 32.3% | 163 | ||
| No opinion | 49.2% | 248 | ||
| 1. What are the one or two most important things that WINS has done for you and your fellow state employees? | ||
| answered question | 86 | |
| skipped question | 482 | |
| Response Count |
||
| Show replies | 86 | |
| 1. What are one or two of the things that make you unfavorable toward WINS? | ||
| answered question | 156 | |
| skipped question | 412 | |
| Response Count |
||
| Show replies | 156 | |
| 1. In general, do you favor having state employees belong to a union? | ||||
| answered question | 487 | |||
| skipped question | 81 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| Yes | 31.2% | 152 | ||
| No | 37.0% | 180 | ||
| No opinion | 31.8% | 155 | ||
| 1. Do you think WINS is the best union for you and your fellow state employees? | ||||
| answered question | 150 | |||
| skipped question | 418 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| Yes, WINS is the best union | 64.7% | 97 | ||
| No, would rather be part of different union | 35.3% | 53 | ||
| 1. If there were another vote by state employees to either SUPPORT/OPPOSE representation by WINS, how would you likely vote? | ||||
| answered question | 321 | |||
| skipped question | 247 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| Yes, support WINS | 34.9% | 112 | ||
| No, oppose WINS | 65.1% | 209 | ||
| 1. As you may recall, there was an election in 2008 in which state employees were asked to SUPPORT or OPPOSE WINS as your representative union. Would records indicate that you voted in that election? | ||||
| answered question | 466 | |||
| skipped question | 102 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| Yes, voted in the election | 41.8% | 195 | ||
| No, did not vote in election | 58.2% | 271 | ||
| 1. Do you recall whether you voted YES to support WINS or NO in the election in 2008? | ||||
| answered question | 195 | |||
| skipped question | 373 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| Yes, support WINS | 51.3% | 100 | ||
| No, did not support WINS | 48.7% | 95 | ||
| 1. Please indicate the reason that best describes why you did not vote in that election: | ||||
| answered question | 270 | |||
| skipped question | 298 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| Didn’t care enough one way or the other. | 20.0% | 54 | ||
| Did not know how or when to vote. | 12.6% | 34 | ||
| Did not think my vote mattered or would be counted accurately. | 5.6% | 15 | ||
| Intended to vote but then forgot to vote by the deadline. | 10.0% | 27 | ||
| Was not employed by the State of Colorado at that time. | 18.9% | 51 | ||
| Other. | 33.0% | 89 | ||
| 1. What is your age? | ||||
| answered question | 458 | |||
| skipped question | 110 | |||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
|||
| 18-34 | 11.8% | 54 | ||
| 35-44 | 21.8% | 100 | ||
| 45-54 | 37.8% | 173 | ||
| 55+ | 28.6% | 131 | ||
| DownloadCreate Chart2. What is your gender? | |||
| answered question | 454 | ||
| skipped question | 114 | ||
| Response Percent |
Response Count |
||
| Male | 47.4% | 215 | |
| Female | 52.6% | 239 | |
| DownloadCreate Chart3. Which of the following best describes where in the state you currently live? | ||
| answered question | 458 | |
| skipped question | 110 | |
Group seeking to decertify state employee’s union
BY STEVEN K. PAULSON
Associated Press Writer
Published: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:10 AM MST
DENVER | An anti-union coalition has begun steps to decertify a state employee union, the coalition’s founder said Friday.
Dave Ohmart, who formed a coalition of about 200 people in the organization he calls Colorado LOSES, began sending out e-mails Friday to about 2,000 members of the 7,600 members of the state’s professional and financial services divisions in an effort to determine if they are happy with the state employee union WINS.
Ohmart says if a third of the 3,500 members of Workers for Innovation and New Solutions are dissatisfied, he plans to begin decertification in August, the two-year anniversary of the union’s founding.
About 3,500 of the state’s 25,000 eligible employees have joined the union from state divisions that include teachers, state troopers, transportation and other departments. Ohmart said there is no way of knowing which state workers he is polling are union members.
The poll asks state workers if they support WINS, if they voted for a state employees’ union and if they are happy with the union’s effort over the past year and a half.
“If I find state workers don’t like the union, I will try to decertify it,” he said.
The union was formed after Gov. Bill Ritter signed an executive order authorizing “partnership agreements” that will make better use of workers’ abilities and allow them to meet with management to discuss concerns.
Ritter’s spokesman, Evan Dreyer, said the governor was unaware of an effort to decertify the union, but he said the governor believes it is working well.
“We have good relations with Colorado WINS. They’ve been working with us on furloughs and other measures to balance the state budget,” Dreyer said.
A spokesman for Colorado WINS did not return phone calls seeking comment.
When Ritter signed the order in 2007, he insisted it doesn’t allow collective bargaining and doesn’t require employees to join a union or force them to pay dues if they decide against joining.
Ritter signed the executive order to show he wasn’t anti-union after angering unions when vetoed a bill in 2007 that would have made it easier for them to form closed shops, even though he had promised to support it. He said business leaders should have had more of a voice in the debate before it passed and objected to the process, not the bill.
Ohmart was among some state employees who complained the union was pushy and tried to coerce employees into joining the union.
Ohmart, an employee at the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, said he formed a group to counter the union drive. He said his recruiting signs were been vandalized and the state refused to allow him to use state e-mail accounts, even though the union has monthly access.
Ohmart said about 200 employees have contacted him asking him how to resist union pressure.
Ohmart said employees are wasting their money paying the unions because their wages and benefits are set by the Legislature and the state already has a grievance procedure. He said the union can raise millions of dollars without having to account for how it is spent.
Here is how ColoradoWINS is spending dues received from supporting Colorado members: They sent WINS members to Maine to fight TABOR, there. WHY is WINS spending Colorado-member dues to send Colorado State employees to Maine?
I thought ColoradoWINS was fighting for OUR best interests!
If you join WINS, or if WINS forces ALL OF US to pay some sort of maintenance fee, our dues will not always be spent here to fully support US. As I have said before, they ONLY want our money. They are not interested in OUR needs…only theirs.
Who are they: SEIU, AFT, AFSCME (the three national unions behind WINS). Political organizations that spend money on POLITICS! And, as you now know, not on Colorado politics.
If I want to support a political party, I want to send my own money, not have someone else decide where it goes.
Maintenance fee? Force US to pay maintenance fees? That’s right. As part of their charter, they are obligated to have the Executive Order made into LAW via the General Assembly! As part of that, they will demand that non-members pay maintenance fees if we don’t join WINS and pay dues.
Help stop this!
David Ohmart
Governor Ritter has decided not to run for a second term.
What does this mean for WINS?
The union has just lost its creator. They now have to take their battle to the General Assembly, mostly democrats, who will now focus, according to the WINS charter, to create legislation making state employee unions law. They fear that the next governor, if a republican, independent, or tea party member, will trash the executive order that allowed their existence (Scott McInnis has already stated he would do just that). And trust me…they do not want to see the millions of dollars spent to create WINS flushed down the drain. And, more importantly, they don’t want to lose the, up to, thirteen million dollars, they could receive annually from dues, vanish at the stoke of a pen.
WINS is already showing that they are in dire straits by going up to peoples’ homes and, thuggishly, pushing for membership (which has fallen off). They received just under 8,000 votes (out of 31,000) to be here, but have fewer than 3,500 members (and I wonder if that number is accurate).
The governor has already stated he will do things that are necessary to balance the budget…things that will not please everyone. What does he care…he’s gone now. That places our PERA in jeopardy. Do you really believe WINS is going to change that? NOT!
WINS has NO power, but they sure talk it up, don’t they. All they want is YOUR money.
Can you do something? Sure you can. Watch for my blog to keep informed about what WINS is up to. When it gets to the point that they present their issue to the general assembly, call and write your state representatives to let them know that you are against it.
Dave
WINS is currently involved in an active recruiting program and going house-to-house. Several reports have come to me about their “brutish” behavior when they show up. I have heard they are permitted to “recruit” but they don’t have to be “thuggish” about it.
If you don’t want to have this happen to you, request a special form from me and send it to:
Colorado WINS
2525 W. Alameda Ave.
Denver, CO 80219-9989
Or if you hear of someone who has this happen to them, give them this information.
I also recommend you and others send an email to Martin.Flahive@state.co.us he is the lawyer for the governor when it comes to union activity…and cc your HR director giving details of the event.
David Ohmart
The Biggest Loser
In Utah where a state employee unions of exist, union leaders are taking paid leave to attend union meetings. That’s right…union leaders are able to attend meetings paid for by tax payers and union dues. For more on this, listen to the Ben DeGrow interview at http://ivoices.org and click to listen: Accountability for Tax-Funded Teachers Union Release Time?
Is this how you want your union dues to work for your? Oh, you don’t pay dues…you will if WINS gets its way and makes union representation law…Oh, yea, its coming.
Help me fight them back into oblivian…
Dave Ohmart
I had the opportunity to speak for a few minutes on KOA radio with Mike Rosen, Thursday, about the latest fiasco with AFSCME sending out membership cards. I was also invited to participate in a podcast with Ben DeGrow of the Independence Institute.
On the Mike Rosen page (http://www.850koa.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=shows_rosen.xm) look for the 11/19/09 date and the 11-12 time slot (Mike talks about the unions coming on board with the Obama administration). I am about 10 minutes in and spoke for about 3 min.
The following is the email link from Ben to his podcast
Dave,
The podcast is up and live. A direct link is posted below.
It’s also currently #1 on the main http://iVoices.org page.
David Ohmart
The Biggest Loser